COS good-practice implementation
Worked on implementing Center for Offshore Safety (COS) good practices, connecting guidance with the way offshore teams engage, assess controls, write procedures, and work with contractors.
29° 45′ N
95° 22′ W
95° 22′ W
Case study / Offshore Energy
Case study / Offshore Energy
Making offshore good practice part of everyday work.
NovaPath worked with an offshore energy operator to implement COS good practices through leadership engagement, barrier and control-effectiveness testing, procedure-writing improvements, and risk-based offshore contractor alignment.
Client
An offshore energy operator
Practice
Offshore Energy
Focus
Good-practice implementation
The work
Connecting leadership, controls, and offshore execution.
The offshore engagement brought together COS good-practice implementation, learning from normal work, barrier assessment, procedure-writing guidance, and risk-based contractor alignment.
Our work connected these disciplines: leadership engagement with the reality of field work; barrier awareness with control-effectiveness testing; written procedures with practical requirements; and contractor arrangements with the risks and controls of the operation.
Scope delivered
Five connected workstreams.
The support covered both program development and implementation in offshore operating practice.
Learning from normal work in leadership engagement
Built learning from normal work into leadership field engagement. The focus was on learning from everyday work—not waiting for an incident—and using engagement to understand operating conditions, procedures, and the barriers crews rely on.
Barrier assessments and control-effectiveness testing
Conducted barrier assessments and control-effectiveness testing to examine the protection around offshore work. This brought the focus to how controls operate in practice, rather than relying only on their documented presence.
IOGP procedure-writing guidance
Implemented IOGP procedure-writing guidance to improve the way offshore procedures communicate what the work requires. The focus was on clarity, practical use, and the connection between written requirements and operating work.
Risk-based offshore contractor alignment
Upgraded offshore contractor alignment using risk-based frameworks, connecting contractor arrangements with the risk profile of the work and the controls that need to operate across the operator–contractor interface.
The connected approach
Good practice, built into the operating system.
The approach was to connect learning, leadership, procedures, barriers, and contractor interfaces—not treat each as an isolated initiative. Learning from normal work helped shape leadership engagement, while barrier assessments and control testing grounded the work in offshore risk.
Explore Offshore EnergyIndustry guidance
Related reading.
Background on leadership site engagement, normal-work learning, and clear technical requirements.
N 29° 45′ · W 95° 22′
Set a course
What is your team working on?
Tell us what you want to change and where support might be useful.